Are proposed changes for unfair dismissal Fair or Unfair?
Tuesday 22 November 2011 - 17:30 to 19:30
At Smith & Williamson, Portwall Place, Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NA
Includes canapés, wine and time to network with fellow Directors
Join Directors and Senior HR Practitioners as we chair an IoD & CIPD debate with John Dalby, Head of Employment & Company Departments at Gregg Latchams LLP Malcolm Davey FCIPD, HR Consultant & former Director of Corporate Services, Government Office for the South West on the proposed employment law.
Employees normally need 12 months minimum qualifying service, unless there are other issues such as discrimination, health & safety or whistle blowing (reporting a criminal act) involved, to bring a case for unfair dismissal. The Government proposes to change the qualifying period for protection against unfair dismissal to two years of service and also to introduce fees for tribunal applications in an attempt to reduce the number of claims and give businesses more confidence in recruiting staff. However the Employment Lawyers Association argues that employers make recruitment decisions based on the needs of the company, not the opportunity to have two years before a claim can be made against them. Brendan Barber, the TUC general secretary, when the changes were announced said 'While everyone wants to see a quicker and more efficient tribunal system, taking away people's rights and pricing vulnerable workers out of the system is the worst possible way to achieve this'. So are these changes Fair or Unfair? Join us for a competitive debate where you will vote to decide.
To book a place click here